Has “Nuts” gone nuts? We don’t mean to pick on one of our favorite totty suppliers, since they are innovators in the lad mag industry, but what’s up with their latest cover feature on Big Brother bird Chanelle? The bold text boasts of a “nudity exclusive” with a “starkers” reality TV star being “completely in the buff” … except for the small detail that she’s not actually naked in any of the photos.
Ok, technically she’s not wearing clothes, but when all the good parts are strategically covered up, what good does that do the reader? We only mention this because there’s seems a growing trend of bloggers and magazines shouting about this “naked” celebrity taking it “all off” for that person’s camera, while we frustrated viewers are left with the everything to the imagination. When the girl is as hot as this, why oversell it? So we’re calling for an end to this false advertising right now. If you’re going to use the words “nude” or “naked,” to promote your product then you’re going to have to at least show us a nipple. (And no, the butt doesn’t count. If we can see it on “NYPD Blue” reruns then it’s not worth shouting about.)
· Chanelle Gets Naked In Nuts (dailypoa.com)
· In the Magazine (nuts.co.uk)
More: continued here